Constitutional Courts in New Democracies: Understanding Variation in East Asia
نویسنده
چکیده
The article shows how judicial review has expanded around the globe from the United States, Western Europe, and Japan to become a regular feature of constitutional design in Africa and Asia. Although the formal power to exercise judicial review is now nearly universal in democratic states, courts have varied in the extent to which they are willing to exercise this power in practice. After decades of authoritarian rule, East Asia has experienced a wave of democratization since the mid-1980s. Transitions toward more open political structures have been effectuated in Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Mongolia and Indonesia, and even the Leninist states of China and Vietnam have experienced tentative moves toward more participatory politics. These political transitions have been accompanied by an important but understudied phenomenon: the emergence of powerful constitutional courts in the region. Constitutional courts have exercised review to challenge political authorities when conflicts arise among government institutions or governments impinge on individual rights.
منابع مشابه
Constitutional Courts in East Asia: Understanding Variation
concrete review Both Concrete Abstract but includes referrals from ordinary courts Both Review of legislation ex post/ ex ante Both Ex post Ex post Ex post
متن کاملThe Judicial Popularity Contest: A Model of Judicial Behavior in New Democracies with Preliminary Evidence from Indonesia
One note about my goals might be helpful. I hope to obtain funding to spend a month or so with the Indonesian Constitutional Court next summer in order to better learn how the justices actually think about cases. This could be important because, as I discuss at the very end, the empirical approach I take originates from the literature on courts in developed legal systems, but I’m not sure how f...
متن کاملThe Future of Teague Retroactivity, or â•œRedressability,â•š after Danforth v. Minnesota: Why Lower Courts Should Give Retroactive Effect to New Constitutional Rules of Criminal Procedure in Postconviction Proceedings
Although the Supreme Court’s 1989 decision in Teague v. Lane generally prohibits the application of new constitutional rules of criminal procedure in federal habeas review of state-court judgments, the Court’s 2008 decision in Danforth v. Minnesota frees state courts from Teague’s strictures. Danforth explicitly permits state courts to fashion their own rules governing the retroactive applicati...
متن کاملTesting Asian Corruption Exceptionalism: Corruption and Trust in Asian Democracies
While voluminous studies have attributed the continuing decline of institutional trust to political corruption, the link between corruption and institutional trust in Asia has yet been explored systematically. Testing the effect of corruption on institutional trust is theoretically important and empirically challenging, since many suggests that contextual factors in Asia such as political cultu...
متن کاملEvolution of the Asia-Pacific Trade Architecture: Stocktake and Future Outlook
APEC Study Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand    Abstract:  One of the key sets of questions underlying Asia Pacific economic cooperation over the last decade has been over the nature and form of the regional trade architecture that would gradually emerge from the turmoil of the Asia-Pacific ânoodle bowlâ of bilateral and plurilateral FTAs, and how that architecture...
متن کامل